Africa Asia Middle East عربي Français PlusNews Film & TV Photo Radio free subscription Mobile RSS find IRIN on facebook follow IRIN on twitter



humanitarian news and analysis
a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Advanced search
 Saturday 21 November 2009 Latest reports:
 
Home 
Africa 
Asia 
Middle East 
Weekly reports 
Global Issues 
In-Depth reports 
Maps 
Most popular 
 
HyperLink Bookmark and Share
AFGHANISTAN: Government dismisses legal poppy cultivation


Photo: IRIN
Afghanistan produces about 87 percent of the world's opium
KABUL, 28 September 2005 (IRIN) - The Afghan government has rejected a call to legalise poppy cultivation in the country, following a recent report advocating for its legitimate production. "Poor security in the country means there are simply no guarantees that opium won't be smuggled out of the country for the illicit narcotics trade abroad," Afghan Minister for Counter Narcotics, Habibullah Qaderi, said in the Afghan capital, Kabul. "Without an effective control mechanism, a lot of opium would still be refined into heroin for illicit markets in the West and elsewhere," he claimed. His comments follow Monday's report by the Senlis Council, a leading international drug policy think-tank, advocating for the legal cultivation of opium poppy in the Central Asian state. According to the Paris-based group, the opium would be used to produce essential medicines such as morphine and codeine which could help millions of people in developing countries who are unnecessarily dying in pain because they don't have access to such medicines. Moreover, the study concluded that such a plan would contribute to ending the Afghan drug crisis and help bring stability to the country. Licensing would move poppy crops away from the illegal drug trade and into the legal economy, a statement by the group said. "It's a case of turning something bad into something good," executive director of the group, Emmanuel Reinert, said. "The current drug policy in Afghanistan has completely failed to control opium production and has undermined development efforts." But according to Qaderi, this is a proposal whose time has not yet come. "The report issued today [Monday] is just a study which will take more time to complete. It will not be possible meanwhile to cultivate any opium poppy legally," the government official reiterated. Lack of an adequate control system remains the main argument against legalisation of opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan. Additionally, the legalisation debate could stir confusion and raise false expectations, which could be particularly detrimental for the development of drug control in Afghanistan at this point in time, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has warned. Afghanistan produces about 87 percent of the world's opium, most of which is smuggled to Europe, making it an integral part of the fledgling state's economy. The illegal export of opium makes up about half of the country's gross domestic product (GDP), with illegal opium estimated to be worth more than US $100 a kilogramme.
Kaka Razaq, a 55-year-old farmer, was shocked and disappointed after the government eradicated his poppy field
Under current international law, countries are free, however, to apply for a licence from the United Nations International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) to legally produce and sell opium for medical purposes. Many countries, including Australia, France, Turkey and India, already do. The estimated average annual income per poppy farmer in Afghanistan in 2003 was $3,900. In 2004, due to a fall in opium prices at farm levels, farmers earned about $1,700 that year. The average field size per farmer in Afghanistan is estimated at about 0.4 ha. Meanwhile, Reinert defended the potential role of opium. "Opium licensing is a road-map to stability," he said, warning that the current policy of eradicating poppy crops, on which many farmers survive, threatens Afghanistan's future peace and democracy after over two decades of conflict. "Eradication is counterproductive because it takes away farmers' livelihoods without replacing them. Ultimately, they will lose faith in their government and would create the same situation that allowed the Taliban to take control in the past."


Theme(s): (IRIN) Economy

[ENDS]

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
HyperLink Bookmark and Share
Countries
FREE Subscriptions
Your e-mail address:


Submit your request
 More reports
  • 18/Nov/2009
    AFGHANISTAN: New report highlights people’s thirst for peace
  • 17/Nov/2009
    AFGHANISTAN: Schools to reopen for exams after H1N1 shutdown
  • 16/Nov/2009
    AFGHANISTAN: Toilet tribulations
  • 15/Nov/2009
    ASIA: IRIN-ASIA Weekly Round-up 254 for 8 - 14 November 2009
  • 13/Nov/2009
    ASIA: Breastfeeding more crucial in emergencies
     More on Economy
  • 18/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Food aid that gets you two for the price of one
  • 17/Nov/2009
    SRI LANKA: Migration dream remains, despite dangers
  • 16/Nov/2009
    VIETNAM: Ethnic minorities lose out on maternal healthcare
  • 12/Nov/2009
    LAOS: Scrap metal income courts UXO danger
  • 10/Nov/2009
    MYANMAR: Cyclone-affected fishermen still need help
     Most Read
    GUINEA: Timeline since independence
    GLOBAL: Children’s rights not yet a reality
    UGANDA: HIV-positive women need family planning services, study shows
    DRC-CONGO: New wave of refugees flees fresh fighting
    BANGLADESH: Two years after Cyclone Sidr, survivors still seeking shelter

    Services:  Africa | Asia | Middle East | PlusNews | Film & TV | Photo | Radio | Weekly | Live news map | Interviews | E-mail subscription
    Feedback | E-mail Webmaster | Terms & Conditions | Really Simple Syndication News Feeds | About IRIN | Jobs | Bookmark IRINnews | Donors

    Copyright © IRIN 2009. All rights reserved.
    This material comes to you via IRIN, the humanitarian news and analysis service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or its Member States. The boundaries, names and designations used on maps on this site do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the UN. Republication is subject to terms and conditions as set out in the IRIN copyright page.