Africa Asia Middle East عربي Français PlusNews Film & TV Photo Radio free subscription Mobile RSS find IRIN on facebook follow IRIN on twitter



humanitarian news and analysis
a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Advanced search
 Saturday 21 November 2009 Latest reports:
 
Home 
Africa 
Asia 
Middle East 
Weekly reports 
Global Issues 
In-Depth reports 
Maps 
Most popular 
 
HyperLink Bookmark and Share
DRC-RWANDA: New pact on armed groups in the Kivus hailed


Photo: USIP
KINSHASA, 14 November 2007 (IRIN) - Analysts have welcomed the latest in a series of agreements between the governments of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) aimed at resolving the perennial threat to regional stability posed by the armed groups in eastern DRC.

DRC’s two Kivu provinces are swarming with a variety of such groups, including remnants of Rwandan Hutu army units (ex-Forces armées rwandaise, FAR) and Interahamwe militias who fled across the border after carrying out much of the killing during Rwanda’s 1994 genocide; former members of defunct Congolese rebel groups supported by Rwanda during DRC’s 1998-2002 civil war, who have resisted reintegration into a new national army; and pro-DRC civil defence brigades loosely grouped as Mayi Mayi.

Fighting between one group of recalcitrant rebels, led by General Laurent Nkunda, and the regular army has exacerbated the humanitarian crisis in North Kivu, with 370,000 civilians displaced since December.

"This commitment appears to be more realistic because a date has been set to prepare a detailed plan for the disarmament and repatriation of Rwandan Hutus," said Henri Kokolo, a researcher in international politics and dean of the Institute of Information Sciences and Communication in Kinshasa, the DRC capital.

Representatives from the DRC and Rwandan governments met in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, on 9 November to bolster at least half a dozen previous, largely ineffective, agreements on the same issue dating back to 1999.

Rwanda twice sent its troops into eastern DRC – in 1996 and 1998 – saying its neighbour had not done enough to neutralise the Hutu fighters there.

In Nairobi, Kinshasa pledged to "prepare, by 1 December 2007, a detailed plan to disarm and address the threat posed by the ex-FAR/Interahamwe" and to launch military operations to dismantle these groups.

In return, Rwanda agreed not to support any armed groups in eastern DRC and to prevent them crossing its border in either direction. The DRC has frequently accused Rwanda of backing Nkunda, a charge denied equally often.

The Nairobi meeting was facilitated by the UN, the US Administration and the European Union.


Photo: Noel E. King/IRIN
Civilians displaced by conflict in eastern DRC
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described the agreement as a "significant breakthrough", saying it offered an opportunity for the comprehensive resolution of problems posed by irregular armed groups in the eastern DRC.

Philippe Biyoya, professor of political science at the University of Lubumbashi and the Protestant University of Kinshasa, said support for the agreement from western powers could encourage DRC and Rwanda to match their words with action.

"It will surely encourage the two states to refrain from delaying tactics and live up to their commitments," said Biyoya.

The EU’s Special Representative for the Great Lakes Region, Roland van de Geer, said the EU "feels obliged to engage and has an obligation to make this agreement effective".

The DRC government said the accord showed it was serious about tackling the armed groups in eastern DRC.

"We have put in place the mechanisms for putting a definitive end to these residual forces which have continued to menace our people," the Associated Press quoted Foreign Minister Mbusa Nyamwisi as saying.

In Kigali, the Rwandan capital, The New Times, a newspaper close to the government, described the Nairobi accord as "a milestone in the recent history of the region. For the first time in a long time, there is hesitant reason to believe that things may soon be seriously getting better."

Under the agreement, the DRC must transfer Rwandan genocide and war crimes suspects to either Rwanda or the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.

Both countries must also make it easier for their refugees to return home.

ei/jn/am/mw


Theme(s): (IRIN) Conflict, (IRIN) Governance, (IRIN) Refugees/IDPs

[ENDS]

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
HyperLink Bookmark and Share
Countries
FREE Subscriptions
Your e-mail address:


Submit your request
 More reports
  • 20/Nov/2009
    CENTRAL AND EASTERN AFRICA: IRIN-CEA Weekly Round-up 506 for 14 - 20 November 2009
  • 20/Nov/2009
    DRC-CONGO: New wave of refugees flees fresh fighting
  • 13/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Global Fund approves $2.4 billion in new grants
  • 13/Nov/2009
    CENTRAL AND EASTERN AFRICA: IRIN-CEA Weekly Round-up 505 for 7 - 13 November 2009
  • 12/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Mismatch between HIV spending and need
     More on Governance
  • 20/Nov/2009
    GUINEA: Timeline since independence
  • 20/Nov/2009
    DRC-CONGO: New wave of refugees flees fresh fighting
  • 19/Nov/2009
    Analysis: Upcoming polls to test Burundi's fragile peace
  • 19/Nov/2009
    ZIMBABWE: Weapons theft stokes fears of instability
  • 17/Nov/2009
    GUINEA: Uncertainty over toxic chemicals in Conakry
     Most Read
    GUINEA: Timeline since independence
    GLOBAL: Children’s rights not yet a reality
    UGANDA: HIV-positive women need family planning services, study shows
    BANGLADESH: Two years after Cyclone Sidr, survivors still seeking shelter
    DRC-CONGO: New wave of refugees flees fresh fighting

    Services:  Africa | Asia | Middle East | PlusNews | Film & TV | Photo | Radio | Weekly | Live news map | Interviews | E-mail subscription
    Feedback | E-mail Webmaster | Terms & Conditions | Really Simple Syndication News Feeds | About IRIN | Jobs | Bookmark IRINnews | Donors

    Copyright © IRIN 2009. All rights reserved.
    This material comes to you via IRIN, the humanitarian news and analysis service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or its Member States. The boundaries, names and designations used on maps on this site do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the UN. Republication is subject to terms and conditions as set out in the IRIN copyright page.