Africa Asia Middle East عربي Français PlusNews Film & TV Photo Radio free subscription Mobile RSS find IRIN on facebook follow IRIN on twitter



humanitarian news and analysis
a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Advanced search
 Saturday 21 November 2009 Latest reports:
 
Home 
Africa 
Asia 
Middle East 
Weekly reports 
Global Issues 
In-Depth reports 
Maps 
Most popular 
 
HyperLink Bookmark and Share
BURKINA FASO: Cotton producers celebrate WTO ruling against US subsidies


Photo: Brahima Ouedraogo/IRIN
Cotton farmers in Burkina Faso see their income dwindling even if their production increases.
OUAGADOUGOU, 16 October 2007 (IRIN) - Cotton industry officials in West Africa’s largest cotton producing nation are celebrating a ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO) that US government subsidies to cotton farmers there undermine free trade.

“I am hopeful that the situation here will get better,” said Francois Traore, President of the African Cotton Producers Association. “At least it tells the truth that there are distortions against Africa’s development interests.”

According to Traore, who is also president of Burkina Faso’s National Union of Cotton Producers, the WTO and the international community are now obliged to force the US to respect the ruling.

“Subsidies are preventing us from living,” Traore said. “If nothing is done, we can now say that nobody wants us to develop.”

The WTO ruled on 15 October that the US had failed to bring subsidies and export credit guarantees to US cotton farmers into conformity with the WTO. The subsidies and export credit guarantees were put in place through the 2002 Farm Bill which the WTO had ruling against in 2005.

Officials in developing countries and international poverty analysts say the subsidies drive down prices, making it hard for small farmers in poor countries to compete on international markets.

The ruling could open the door to billions of dollars in trade sanctions against the US by Brazil, another major cotton producing country, which initially brought the case against the US.

The Brazilian government says the US only retained its place as the world's second-largest cotton grower by paying out US$12.5 billion in government subsidies to its farmers between August 1999 and July 2003. China is the largest exporter of cotton, while Brazil is fifth.

Oxfam America president Raymond Offenheiser, said the US Congress is still considering a new Farm Bill that would leave farm subsidies largely unchanged. “This would be most tragic for the millions of people in developing countries whose livelihoods are threatened on a daily basis because of US agricultural subsidies”, Offenheiser said in a statement.

Officials in Burkina Faso are not overly optimistic about the prospects of their cotton industry in the immediate future. “We hope that at the US-executive level, officials will feel embarrassed for always being pointed at and that something can be done to implement the ruling. But the problem remains with the US Congress which is under strong pressure from the US cotton industry lobby,” said Seriba Ouattara, Director General at the Ministry of Health.

Visiting Burkina Faso on 15 October, Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva called on the WTO to keep backing Burkina Faso and Benin, Chad and Mali which together form Africa’s ‘C4’ group which has lobbied for changes to US subsidies. “We must work together to protect [our] farmers so that they can gain competitiveness on the international market”, President Da Silva said.

Last October, in a video conference with the US Congress, the President of Burkina Faso Blaise Compaore stressed the importance cotton plays in poverty alleviation in C4 countries. His government estimates that almost half the population relies directly or indirectly on cotton.

An estimated 20 million people, many of them subsistence farmers depend on cotton in West and Central African countries for cash.

According to Oxfam, sub-Saharan cotton farmers have lost $450 million since 2004 and the 20 million people who depend on the product have become poorer even though many have increased the amount of cotton they grow.

Oxfam estimates abolishing US subsidies to the cotton industry would lead to a 6 to 14 percent increase in the price of cotton. As a result households in Africa’s cotton producing countries would benefit by 2.3 to 5.7 percent.

bo/nr/dh


Theme(s): (IRIN) Aid Policy, (IRIN) Economy, (IRIN) Governance

[ENDS]

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
HyperLink Bookmark and Share
Countries
FREE Subscriptions
Your e-mail address:


Submit your request
 More reports
  • 20/Nov/2009
    WEST AFRICA: IRIN-WA Weekly Round-up 505 for 14 - 20 November 2009
  • 13/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Global Fund approves $2.4 billion in new grants
  • 13/Nov/2009
    WEST AFRICA: IRIN-WA Weekly Round-up 504 for 7 - 13 November 2009
  • 12/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Mismatch between HIV spending and need
  • 12/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Disabled should claim rights in UN convention
     More on Economy
  • 19/Nov/2009
    LIBERIA: Disease rife as more people squeeze into fewer toilets
  • 18/Nov/2009
    SOMALIA: Galkayo threatened by rising insecurity
  • 18/Nov/2009
    GLOBAL: Food aid that gets you two for the price of one
  • 17/Nov/2009
    SOUTH AFRICA-ZIMBABWE: More than 2,000 Zimbabweans flee, fearing attacks
  • 10/Nov/2009
    SOMALIA: Saudi livestock move boosts Somaliland economy
     Most Read
    GUINEA: Timeline since independence
    GLOBAL: Children’s rights not yet a reality
    UGANDA: HIV-positive women need family planning services, study shows
    DRC-CONGO: New wave of refugees flees fresh fighting
    BANGLADESH: Two years after Cyclone Sidr, survivors still seeking shelter

    Services:  Africa | Asia | Middle East | PlusNews | Film & TV | Photo | Radio | Weekly | Live news map | Interviews | E-mail subscription
    Feedback | E-mail Webmaster | Terms & Conditions | Really Simple Syndication News Feeds | About IRIN | Jobs | Bookmark IRINnews | Donors

    Copyright © IRIN 2009. All rights reserved.
    This material comes to you via IRIN, the humanitarian news and analysis service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or its Member States. The boundaries, names and designations used on maps on this site do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the UN. Republication is subject to terms and conditions as set out in the IRIN copyright page.